Bit of a congrats to the Florida State Bar. Jack Thompson is officially gone from legal process. He's got less than 30 days to close up any cases and shift his clients elsewhere, or if he has no clients, he's shut down immediatly.
The news of the disbarment has generated different responses in the video game world. Many gamers are taking the news like a ruling against SCO. It's great, but really, gamers should strive to hold the higher moral and ethical ground. Others are going out of their way to crack jokes about how disbarred Jack Thompson is.
As for myself, I find myself in the middle. I so very badly want to be the better person and not mock Jack Thompson at all. I do not want to make any jokes about what's left of his career. He brought the shame and misfortune upon himself, and I'm grateful that a weapon used by liberal democrats has been neutralized. At the same time, there is a feeling of pleasure gained from coming up with sarcastic comments and spiteful words to be thrown in the face of somebody like Jack Thompson.
I think I can say it best this way though: Good riddance to Bad rubbish.
Friday, September 26, 2008
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Adventure Crossing
Guess this is as good a time as any. For those who've been wondering why I've been so silent... I've picked up an outside job.
As of the past several weeks I have been working at / for Adventure Crossing. Website is http://www.adventure-crossing.com and some of the re-writing I've done can be found on the What's Playing Now Lasertron page.
The best way to describe myself in this job is Assistant Shop Tech. So... if you'd, I dunno, like to actually find me in person... ya can.
As of the past several weeks I have been working at / for Adventure Crossing. Website is http://www.adventure-crossing.com and some of the re-writing I've done can be found on the What's Playing Now Lasertron page.
The best way to describe myself in this job is Assistant Shop Tech. So... if you'd, I dunno, like to actually find me in person... ya can.
Friday, September 12, 2008
Hurricane Ike... little sympathy...
As I write this Hurricane Ike is pounding the shores of Galveston Texas, with Weather.com showing the eye of the storm just about as far away from Galveston as Galveston is from Houston. At the same time that Hurricane Ike is slamming to the shore, various news agencies report that thousands are still in the direct path of the storm and refuse to leave. Various state and federal authorities are on record saying that people who remain in the path of the storm... will die. Some analysts think that Hurricane Ike could take more lives than Hurricane Katrina and Rita combined, and possibly be the most lethal hurricane to ever strike US soil.
While talking about the potential death toll, some friends of mine were shocked at the pure indifference I displayed towards the people remaining in the path of the storm. Quite simply, I can't care about them.
One of the best, and worst, stories I have from the Hurricane Katrina disaster is one I mentioned in passing on the Livejournal site back in September 2005. I seriously took a call from a person who was not getting any cable TV, wanted to watch WWE, and had no roof over their head.
During Top Gear's American Journey across the south a couple seasons ago, Jeremy Clarkson wondered how the richest country in the world could possibly let the squalor and damage remain years after Katrina hit. I just wanted to scream back at Clarkson that he didn't get it. People in Louisiana simply didn't care about their state, or about New Orleans. It was full of Liberal Democrats whose complete and utter failure at the governmental level resulted in the devastation of the city. After Katrina hit, people in New Orleans expected financial handouts, and expected the government, and through the government all the surrounding states to fix everything up and pay for everything.
All I can do is just point at South Carolina, North Carolina, South Georgia, and Flordia, which get smacked by Hurricanes and Tropical storms just about every year. Even after disasters such as Hurricane Hugo or Hurricane Bonnie there were no expectations that the federal government, or the rest of the states, would swoop in and fix everything and pay the financing. Private citizens did the work themselves. Yes, they accepted volunteer help, but even less than 6months after Hurricane Hugo struck in Charleston, the town was pretty much back to normal.
That difference between the costs is marked in a political manner. I shouldn't have to explain it. New Orleans was a disaster because the political party running the city was a disaster.
I can't explain liberalism. I can't explain mental insanity. That's what New Orleans was.
In the same way, I can't explain why people would hunker down with a 200mile plus wide category 2 hurricane moving in. If I had been living in Galveston, or any of the coastal towns in Texas, I'd have done bugged out of there as soon as it became known that the Hurricane was going to hit.
I can't explain people who want to sit in the path of a Hurricane and hope for the best. I don't want to explain people like that. I'm glad I don't think like that. From what I've heard bus business's were offering free rides to people moving away from the coast. I've heard that hotels in the states just north of Texas, and in North Texas, are opening up rooms for Free. Simply provide a drivers license showing you live in one of the landfall cities, and you have shelter for a few days. That's not including the standard opening of Church doors to provide shelter, and the offers that shoot up from people 2 or 3 states away to host families whose homes are in the direct path of the hurricane.
Why, in the world, would someone willingly sit in the middle of a hurricane path then?
I don't know. I have no sympathy for anybody that does.
Honestly, I only feel sorry for the clean-up people, because I've dealt with some of the soon to be, and affected geographical territories. I've taken calls, and I've had to explain to people that a Hurricane hit. I've had to explain that a Hurricane is big. I've had to explain that if a car is flipped over in your drive-way, you probably should have left town (not a joke, trust me on that).
Maybe I'm cold, maybe I'm heartless, and I hope the damage isn't as bad as expected... but sympathy for Hurricane victims who chose to stay in the way of the storm? I have none of that.
While talking about the potential death toll, some friends of mine were shocked at the pure indifference I displayed towards the people remaining in the path of the storm. Quite simply, I can't care about them.
One of the best, and worst, stories I have from the Hurricane Katrina disaster is one I mentioned in passing on the Livejournal site back in September 2005. I seriously took a call from a person who was not getting any cable TV, wanted to watch WWE, and had no roof over their head.
During Top Gear's American Journey across the south a couple seasons ago, Jeremy Clarkson wondered how the richest country in the world could possibly let the squalor and damage remain years after Katrina hit. I just wanted to scream back at Clarkson that he didn't get it. People in Louisiana simply didn't care about their state, or about New Orleans. It was full of Liberal Democrats whose complete and utter failure at the governmental level resulted in the devastation of the city. After Katrina hit, people in New Orleans expected financial handouts, and expected the government, and through the government all the surrounding states to fix everything up and pay for everything.
All I can do is just point at South Carolina, North Carolina, South Georgia, and Flordia, which get smacked by Hurricanes and Tropical storms just about every year. Even after disasters such as Hurricane Hugo or Hurricane Bonnie there were no expectations that the federal government, or the rest of the states, would swoop in and fix everything and pay the financing. Private citizens did the work themselves. Yes, they accepted volunteer help, but even less than 6months after Hurricane Hugo struck in Charleston, the town was pretty much back to normal.
That difference between the costs is marked in a political manner. I shouldn't have to explain it. New Orleans was a disaster because the political party running the city was a disaster.
I can't explain liberalism. I can't explain mental insanity. That's what New Orleans was.
In the same way, I can't explain why people would hunker down with a 200mile plus wide category 2 hurricane moving in. If I had been living in Galveston, or any of the coastal towns in Texas, I'd have done bugged out of there as soon as it became known that the Hurricane was going to hit.
I can't explain people who want to sit in the path of a Hurricane and hope for the best. I don't want to explain people like that. I'm glad I don't think like that. From what I've heard bus business's were offering free rides to people moving away from the coast. I've heard that hotels in the states just north of Texas, and in North Texas, are opening up rooms for Free. Simply provide a drivers license showing you live in one of the landfall cities, and you have shelter for a few days. That's not including the standard opening of Church doors to provide shelter, and the offers that shoot up from people 2 or 3 states away to host families whose homes are in the direct path of the hurricane.
Why, in the world, would someone willingly sit in the middle of a hurricane path then?
I don't know. I have no sympathy for anybody that does.
Honestly, I only feel sorry for the clean-up people, because I've dealt with some of the soon to be, and affected geographical territories. I've taken calls, and I've had to explain to people that a Hurricane hit. I've had to explain that a Hurricane is big. I've had to explain that if a car is flipped over in your drive-way, you probably should have left town (not a joke, trust me on that).
Maybe I'm cold, maybe I'm heartless, and I hope the damage isn't as bad as expected... but sympathy for Hurricane victims who chose to stay in the way of the storm? I have none of that.
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
The Xbox 360 story Microsoft doesn't want you to know about?
Yes, I know, been deadly silent around here. I might go into the past couple of weeks in a later post... but don't count on it.
Anyways, the subject of this post is the price-amputation on the Microsoft Xbox 360. Microsoft now has a version of the Xbox 360 out that's cheaper than the Nintendo Wii, and according to Kotaku, Microsoft says the following:
What if one model of the Xbox 360 was selling so badly that it could experience a 600% increase in sales, and not really add that much to the bottom line of systems moving out the door?
Well, yeah. Such a version does exist. The hard-drive lacking Arcade version. With it's lack of an HDMI port, lack of a hard-drive, and so on, it hasn't exactly been the sales darling if I read the retail reports right.
However, it's now cheaper than a Wii, and more plentiful, so of course it's a ripe target... but for who?
The phenomenal sales figures the Xbox 360 has posted after the price cut may not have actually grown the Xbox 360 market. Dean Takahashi's inside look at the Xbox 360 failures on Venture Beat clues in to the market that was probably buying up the cut-price Xbox 360's. It is estimated that at least 50% plus of all Xbox 360's coming off the assembly lines at launch were dead on arrival. According to the Venture Beat article, the production problems haven't exactly gotten better as the Xbox 360 has continued in the market.
Rather, Microsoft's already written off well over a billion dollars on product replacements, and I don't think they even scratched the surface of the Xbox 360's quality problem.
Here's my catch on the situation. I'm well over 14 people that I know that are technically Xbox 360 owners. I say technically because while they bought an Xbox 360, got the hard-drive, got the memory card, got the controllers, and so on, they don't actually have an Xbox 360. Why? Because their products broke and Microsoft refused to replace or repair the units. Even after the Red Ring of Death Scandal became public, many of these Xbox 360 owners I know continued to remain out of luck in successfully getting their consoles repaired under warranty.
I also know that after the price drop, these Xbox 360 owners went out and picked up the arcade version. Why? So they could play the library of games they already had, so they could get a new Xbox 360 with a warrenty, and because they would get a unit that would hopefully contain the latest motherboard revision with the new heatinks.
Now I don't have any evidence to suggest that a large percentage of new Xbox 360's sold were being used to replace defective and broken units that Microsoft refused to repair or service. I'm not an Xbox 360 owner, and I'm repeating second hand information that I get from chat rooms, message boards, and email. That doesn't qualify as legitimate news source material.
If the anecdotal evidence is right though, Microsoft may have a problem on their hands. The Xbox 360 sales may have sky rocketed, but given the admitted production problems and customer service issues, it's extremely questionable if Microsoft actually grew their targeted market.
Now, Kotaku posted that they'd like to see a Price War start up between the consoles. That's... doubtful.
Here's why.
Sales of the Xbox Arcade present a large problem to Xbox 360 developers. Media Molecule mentioned it when talking about Little Big Planet on Gamesindustry.giz. ID Software has also mentioned it when talking about Rage on the Xbox 360. Developers can't count on gamers actually having a hard-drive. That means developers have to plan on mass-market games fitting onto standard DVD discs. That means that developers run out of the ability to produce or generate high quality visuals on Xbox 360 a lot sooner than they would on a PS3, which is backed by both the massive 25gig single side Blu-Ray disc, and a hard-drive in each machine.
Developers targeting the hard-core market then have to make a sacrifice on the Xbox 360 platform. Requiring hard-drive support, while boosting the capabilities of the game, drastically cuts down on the number of sold consoles the game will work on. However, the chances of the game selling go up, as Hard-core gamers are more likely to part with their money for a good game.
For the hardcore gamer then, whose buying hardcore games, and wants the best visual display, only one Microsoft console actually fits that request. The Playstation 3 competitor, the Xbox 360 Elite, both of which carry a price tag of $399.
So, right now, the hard-core gamer who is wanting it all, isn't going to be interested in the lower versions of the Xbox 360.
And at an equal price, the Xbox 360 really isn't that great of a choice. Microsoft doesn't exactly have that many first party developers. In fact, they are shutting one of them down. Sony, on the other hand, has been pushing first and second party exclusives left and right. One of the most recent, Echochrome, quite literally carried a That's a Sony Game? type confusion.
I could go into the high resolution video and other advantages of the Playstation 3... but I'm not since that isn't the point.
Point wise, feature for feature, Playstation 3's price point offers more than an Xbox 360 at the same price point.
And, come on. Get realistic please. Xbox 360 taking back Wii Sales when Nintendo is still short on stock? Not likely.
I honestly don't see Sony or Nintendo cutting prices for this Christmas Season. Right now, there just isn't a reason to do so.
Now, if Microsoft puts one of the Xbox 360's with a hard-drive below the Wii's current price point, there might be some action from Sony and Nintendo, but I don't see Microsoft wanting to match Sony loss for loss on amount of money running out the door.
Anyways, the subject of this post is the price-amputation on the Microsoft Xbox 360. Microsoft now has a version of the Xbox 360 out that's cheaper than the Nintendo Wii, and according to Kotaku, Microsoft says the following:
Coming off the heels of the console price drop last week, Microsoft Xbox 360 sales have surged, with retailers reporting over 100% sales lift for all Xbox 360 models compared to the previous weekend. Additionally, retailers are reporting that between Friday, Sept. 5 and Sunday, Sept. 7, some Xbox 360 models were selling at six times the rate they were the weekend prior.Impressive statistics to say the least, but it doesn't make sense. Thing is, a 6 fold increase would be 600%. That means that if Microsoft estimate is accurate, while one Xbox 360 improvied it's sales by 600%, the others had to fall in sales numbers. That's logical enough, or is it?
What if one model of the Xbox 360 was selling so badly that it could experience a 600% increase in sales, and not really add that much to the bottom line of systems moving out the door?
Well, yeah. Such a version does exist. The hard-drive lacking Arcade version. With it's lack of an HDMI port, lack of a hard-drive, and so on, it hasn't exactly been the sales darling if I read the retail reports right.
However, it's now cheaper than a Wii, and more plentiful, so of course it's a ripe target... but for who?
The phenomenal sales figures the Xbox 360 has posted after the price cut may not have actually grown the Xbox 360 market. Dean Takahashi's inside look at the Xbox 360 failures on Venture Beat clues in to the market that was probably buying up the cut-price Xbox 360's. It is estimated that at least 50% plus of all Xbox 360's coming off the assembly lines at launch were dead on arrival. According to the Venture Beat article, the production problems haven't exactly gotten better as the Xbox 360 has continued in the market.
Rather, Microsoft's already written off well over a billion dollars on product replacements, and I don't think they even scratched the surface of the Xbox 360's quality problem.
Here's my catch on the situation. I'm well over 14 people that I know that are technically Xbox 360 owners. I say technically because while they bought an Xbox 360, got the hard-drive, got the memory card, got the controllers, and so on, they don't actually have an Xbox 360. Why? Because their products broke and Microsoft refused to replace or repair the units. Even after the Red Ring of Death Scandal became public, many of these Xbox 360 owners I know continued to remain out of luck in successfully getting their consoles repaired under warranty.
I also know that after the price drop, these Xbox 360 owners went out and picked up the arcade version. Why? So they could play the library of games they already had, so they could get a new Xbox 360 with a warrenty, and because they would get a unit that would hopefully contain the latest motherboard revision with the new heatinks.
Now I don't have any evidence to suggest that a large percentage of new Xbox 360's sold were being used to replace defective and broken units that Microsoft refused to repair or service. I'm not an Xbox 360 owner, and I'm repeating second hand information that I get from chat rooms, message boards, and email. That doesn't qualify as legitimate news source material.
If the anecdotal evidence is right though, Microsoft may have a problem on their hands. The Xbox 360 sales may have sky rocketed, but given the admitted production problems and customer service issues, it's extremely questionable if Microsoft actually grew their targeted market.
Now, Kotaku posted that they'd like to see a Price War start up between the consoles. That's... doubtful.
Here's why.
Sales of the Xbox Arcade present a large problem to Xbox 360 developers. Media Molecule mentioned it when talking about Little Big Planet on Gamesindustry.giz. ID Software has also mentioned it when talking about Rage on the Xbox 360. Developers can't count on gamers actually having a hard-drive. That means developers have to plan on mass-market games fitting onto standard DVD discs. That means that developers run out of the ability to produce or generate high quality visuals on Xbox 360 a lot sooner than they would on a PS3, which is backed by both the massive 25gig single side Blu-Ray disc, and a hard-drive in each machine.
Developers targeting the hard-core market then have to make a sacrifice on the Xbox 360 platform. Requiring hard-drive support, while boosting the capabilities of the game, drastically cuts down on the number of sold consoles the game will work on. However, the chances of the game selling go up, as Hard-core gamers are more likely to part with their money for a good game.
For the hardcore gamer then, whose buying hardcore games, and wants the best visual display, only one Microsoft console actually fits that request. The Playstation 3 competitor, the Xbox 360 Elite, both of which carry a price tag of $399.
So, right now, the hard-core gamer who is wanting it all, isn't going to be interested in the lower versions of the Xbox 360.
And at an equal price, the Xbox 360 really isn't that great of a choice. Microsoft doesn't exactly have that many first party developers. In fact, they are shutting one of them down. Sony, on the other hand, has been pushing first and second party exclusives left and right. One of the most recent, Echochrome, quite literally carried a That's a Sony Game? type confusion.
I could go into the high resolution video and other advantages of the Playstation 3... but I'm not since that isn't the point.
Point wise, feature for feature, Playstation 3's price point offers more than an Xbox 360 at the same price point.
And, come on. Get realistic please. Xbox 360 taking back Wii Sales when Nintendo is still short on stock? Not likely.
I honestly don't see Sony or Nintendo cutting prices for this Christmas Season. Right now, there just isn't a reason to do so.
Now, if Microsoft puts one of the Xbox 360's with a hard-drive below the Wii's current price point, there might be some action from Sony and Nintendo, but I don't see Microsoft wanting to match Sony loss for loss on amount of money running out the door.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)